Post by account_disabled on Dec 1, 2023 22:49:05 GMT -5
Reading is a different path for each of us. One after the other, the books we read form a long road and it happens that during this extravagant and multicolored journey we meet a traveller, because that traveler-reader has read one or more books that we have also read. It doesn't matter that its reading is distant in time and space: the meeting exists because it is at a level that goes beyond any law of physics. It is a literary level, it is in the memories, in the memory, which is in a dimension of its own, not contemplated by the physics of matter. Recommend me a book! I often hear this phrase. It also happens that someone writes to me who, having ended up on my blog, takes advantage of it and hopes to receive literary advice. But how do you recommend a book to read? How, if we know nothing about the other, if we don't know the books that form his path? The latest request arrived just yesterday.
But Michele was smart, because he gave Phone Number Data me two important clues: I like novels that deal with nature and animals I loved The Call of the Wild by Jack London It was easy to take London's White Fang , Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings' The Cub and Faulkner's The Great Forest from my mental library. The literary affinities between book and book When we love a novel or an essay, when we encounter readings that leave an impression on us , we are led to read more of that genre, of that theme. It is pure illusion, and we know it well, because it is only a childish desire to perpetuate that reading, to make it revive elsewhere and in time. Last year I read The Morning of the Magicians by Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier and since that day it has always been next to me, right here 20 cm away.
I then searched and read similar books: Helldust by Peter Kolosimo Fictions by Jorge Luis Borges At the limits of the known by Jacques Bergier Todorov's fantasy literature But I don't remember a single word of these 4. If I really want to have the same experience as The Morning of the Magicians , then I'll have to reread it. But don't look for it elsewhere. The imperfection of literary affinities between book and book The syllogism: I like literature about nature and animals The puppy deals with the relationship between man and nature and animals then I will like The Puppy it is, in reality, a false syllogism. In the second premise there is an unknown: that of the book not yet read. Of course, there is a good chance that you will like that book, as well as that the situation I described above regarding The Morning of the Magicians could arise . I recommend a book It is even crazier to suggest a reading to a person if you know very little or nothing about that person.
But Michele was smart, because he gave Phone Number Data me two important clues: I like novels that deal with nature and animals I loved The Call of the Wild by Jack London It was easy to take London's White Fang , Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings' The Cub and Faulkner's The Great Forest from my mental library. The literary affinities between book and book When we love a novel or an essay, when we encounter readings that leave an impression on us , we are led to read more of that genre, of that theme. It is pure illusion, and we know it well, because it is only a childish desire to perpetuate that reading, to make it revive elsewhere and in time. Last year I read The Morning of the Magicians by Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier and since that day it has always been next to me, right here 20 cm away.
I then searched and read similar books: Helldust by Peter Kolosimo Fictions by Jorge Luis Borges At the limits of the known by Jacques Bergier Todorov's fantasy literature But I don't remember a single word of these 4. If I really want to have the same experience as The Morning of the Magicians , then I'll have to reread it. But don't look for it elsewhere. The imperfection of literary affinities between book and book The syllogism: I like literature about nature and animals The puppy deals with the relationship between man and nature and animals then I will like The Puppy it is, in reality, a false syllogism. In the second premise there is an unknown: that of the book not yet read. Of course, there is a good chance that you will like that book, as well as that the situation I described above regarding The Morning of the Magicians could arise . I recommend a book It is even crazier to suggest a reading to a person if you know very little or nothing about that person.